A farmer says the online land record shows the wrong name. This is a revenue-administration question, not a Gram Sabha vote. Start with the current record, title and transaction documents, survey details, and the prescribed correction application. The competent revenue official verifies facts, issues notice or hears objections where required, records an order and permits appeal under the governing law. The precise AP portal and procedure may change, so do not give a citizen a made-up route from an old exam guide.

The Tahsildar's mandal office and RDO's division are the relevant hierarchy to investigate, but the exact decision maker depends on the type of entry and statute. A GP may help locate property or attest local facts where law allows; it does not settle title merely by passing a resolution. For examination, the distinction between territorial overlap and legal power is the central lesson. A service acknowledgement confirms filing, not ownership.

Worked example: Two neighbours contest a boundary line on a revenue sketch. The Tahsildar or prescribed revenue process handles record correction and survey issues; civil courts may decide title disputes. A Gram Panchayat may know the road alignment but does not become a land-title tribunal. Police should investigate a distinct threat or forgery allegation without treating the FIR as a substitute for a civil or revenue decision.

Active recall: Why is a land-record complaint generally not an MPP matter? What is the difference between an application receipt and a reasoned order?