←
AP Police Indian Polity & Constitution · Chapter 15

Chapter 15 — Constitutional, Statutory and Executive Bodies

Why these bodies exist

Figure 15. Constitutional, statutory and executive bodies. Original study diagram; see visual register for source basis and limits.

The Constitution does not require every public function to be performed directly by a ministry. It creates or recognises offices and institutions that conduct elections, audit public accounts, recruit for public services, advise on finance, investigate rights complaints, or support legal administration. Parliament may also establish bodies through legislation, and governments may create executive bodies through administrative decisions.

Competitive exams ask two different kinds of questions:

  1. Identification: Which Article or law creates the body?
  2. Accountability: What is the body permitted to do, and to whom does it report?

An office can be constitutionally established but perform an advisory role. A statutory commission can have important investigative or adjudicatory powers without being a constitutional body. Do not judge a body’s status by its name, importance or independence rhetoric; identify its legal source.

1. Three legal categories

Constitutional body or office

Its establishment, core composition or principal powers are provided directly by the Constitution. Examples include the Election Commission of India (Article 324), Comptroller and Auditor General (Articles 148–151), Union and State Public Service Commissions (Articles 315–323), Finance Commission (Article 280), Attorney General for India (Article 76), and Advocate General for a State (Article 165). The constitutional text may leave details to a law or rules, but the body’s constitutional foundation remains.

Statutory body

It is created by an Act of Parliament or State Legislature. Its structure and powers must be read from that Act and valid rules. Examples include the Central Vigilance Commission under the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003; Central and State Information Commissions under the Right to Information Act, 2005; the National Human Rights Commission under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993; and Lokpal/Lokayuktas under the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 and relevant State laws.

Executive body or institution

It is set up by executive resolution, notification or administrative arrangement rather than a Constitution provision or a founding statute. Its powers are shaped by the legal authority under which it is created. A body can later acquire a statutory or constitutional basis, so status should be tied to the date and law being asked about.

2. Election Commission of India — Article 324

Article 324 vests the superintendence, direction and control of preparation of electoral rolls and conduct of specified elections in the Election Commission of India. These include elections to Parliament, State Legislatures and the offices of President and Vice-President. The Constitution provides that the Commission consists of the Chief Election Commissioner and such number of other Election Commissioners, if any, as the President may from time to time fix, subject to Parliamentary law on appointments.

The ECI is distinct from State Election Commissions. ECI handles the constitutional election categories described above. The State Election Commission conducts Panchayat and Municipal elections under Articles 243K and 243ZA. A question about Gram Panchayat polling should therefore not be answered with Article 324 alone.

Parliament has enacted election laws, including the Representation of the People Acts. The ECI administers and supervises elections within the constitutional and statutory framework; it does not create every election rule independently. Election disputes and challenges are addressed through the Constitution and election laws, including the limits on court intervention during the election process stated in Article 329.

Exam trap

The ECI conducts elections to State Legislative Councils as part of the relevant State Legislature election framework, but local-body elections belong to State Election Commissions. Read the exact office or body in the question before choosing an answer.

3. Comptroller and Auditor General — Articles 148–151

Article 148 provides for a Comptroller and Auditor General of India. The CAG is appointed by the President and can be removed in the same manner and on the same grounds as a Supreme Court judge. After ceasing to hold office, the CAG is not eligible for further office under the Union or a State. These safeguards support institutional independence in audit.

Article 149 provides that the CAG performs duties and exercises powers in relation to accounts of the Union and States, and other authorities or bodies, as prescribed by Parliament by law. The Comptroller and Auditor-General’s Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service Act, 1971 gives statutory detail. Article 150 concerns the form of accounts of the Union and States, prescribed by the President on the advice of the CAG. Under Article 151, reports relating to Union accounts are submitted to the President for laying before each House of Parliament; reports relating to State accounts are submitted to the Governor for laying before the State Legislature.

The audit report informs legislative scrutiny; it is not itself a criminal conviction or a court judgment. Legislatures may examine audit findings through committees such as the Public Accounts Committee. A candidate should distinguish audit, investigation, prosecution and adjudication.

What the CAG does not do

The CAG does not prepare every departmental budget, vote public money, determine criminal guilt, or replace the legislature. It audits within the constitutional and statutory mandate and reports through constitutionally specified channels.

4. Public Service Commissions — Articles 315–323

Article 315 provides for a Union Public Service Commission and a Public Service Commission for each State, subject to its terms. Two or more States may agree to a Joint State Public Service Commission; Parliament may provide for it by law after the required State legislative resolutions. The UPSC may, at a Governor’s request and with the President’s approval, serve some or all of a State’s needs as the Constitution allows.

Public Service Commissions advise on recruitment methods, appointments, promotions, transfers and disciplinary matters specified in Articles 320 and related laws. They conduct examinations and selection processes under applicable rules. Their constitutional existence does not mean every public-sector recruitment in India is automatically conducted by UPSC or a State PSC. Recruitment to particular services may be assigned by law or rules to other authorities.

The President appoints the Chairman and members of UPSC; the Governor appoints those of a State PSC. Articles 316–319 address tenure, resignation, removal and restrictions on further employment. Removal questions require exact Article-reading: the appointing authority and removal authority are not always the same; in specified cases the President removes a member, with the Supreme Court inquiry procedure prescribed by Article 317.

For AP candidates, APPSC is the State Public Service Commission under this constitutional framework. It should not be confused with AP Police recruitment authorities or the Union Public Service Commission. The body conducting a particular recruitment depends on the governing notification and rules.

5. Finance Commission and other constitutional fiscal institutions

Article 280 Finance Commission is covered in Chapter 13. Remember its constitutional character and principal work: recommendations on shareable taxes, State shares and grants-in-aid, along with specified local-body augmentation recommendations and other referred matters. It does not audit government accounts—that is the CAG’s function.

The GST Council under Article 279A is also distinct. It is a constitutional forum for recommendations on specified GST matters; the Union and States legislate within the constitutional framework. The GST Council does not decide every tax question in India and is not a court.

The distinction among these institutions is a reliable elimination tool:

  • CAG: audit and reporting.
  • Finance Commission: fiscal devolution and grants recommendations.
  • GST Council: recommendations on GST matters.
  • Public Accounts Committee: legislative scrutiny of accounts and audit findings.

6. Attorney General and Advocate General

The Attorney General for India under Article 76 is the Union’s highest law officer. The President appoints a person qualified to be appointed a Supreme Court judge. The Attorney General advises the Government of India on legal matters referred by the President and performs other legal duties assigned by the Constitution or law. The office has a right of audience in all courts in India and the right to participate in proceedings of Parliament and its committees, subject to Article 88, but does not vote merely by virtue of that right.

Article 165 provides for an Advocate General for each State. The Governor appoints a person qualified to be appointed a High Court judge. The Advocate General advises the State Government on legal matters and performs duties assigned by the Governor. The Advocate General has rights of audience in courts in the State and may participate in the State Legislature and its committees under Article 177, without a vote solely because of that office.

Neither law officer is the same as the Solicitor General of India, whose office is not created by the Constitution. This is a frequent classification question.

7. Statutory commissions and authorities

Statutory bodies are not “less real” because they are created by legislation. Their jurisdiction can be substantial. The correct study method is to identify the enabling Act, then learn the body’s remit and limits.

  • Central Vigilance Commission: The CVC Act, 2003 establishes the Central Vigilance Commission and sets its statutory role. It is not named as a constitutional commission in the Constitution.
  • Central and State Information Commissions: The Right to Information Act, 2005 provides for these commissions as part of the statutory transparency framework. Their powers, appeal routes and procedure are governed by that Act as amended.
  • National Human Rights Commission: The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 provides for the NHRC and State Human Rights Commissions. It is a statutory body, not an institution created by a specific Constitution Article.
  • Lokpal and Lokayuktas: The 2013 Act provides for the Union Lokpal and a framework concerning State Lokayuktas. State-level structure and operation should be checked against the applicable law and current notifications.

In date-sensitive questions about membership, vacancies, tenure, appointment committees or amendments, consult the current statute and official portal. Do not rely on a memorised list of names from an old edition.

8. Independence, accountability and limits

Independence is not the same as absence of accountability. Constitutional bodies may have security-of-tenure provisions, protected procedures for removal, independent reporting lines or fixed constitutional responsibilities. Statutory bodies derive powers from their Acts and remain subject to the text of those Acts and judicial review. Executive bodies operate within the legal authority that created them.

Use an “institution card” to study each body:

Field

What to record

Legal source

Constitution Article, statute, or executive instrument

Appointment

Who appoints, and under what procedure?

Main function

Audit, election, recruitment, advice, inquiry or adjudication?

Reporting route

President, Governor, Legislature, ministry or another body?

Independence safeguard

Tenure, removal, finance, reporting or functional protection?

Limits

What is outside its jurisdiction?

This method avoids rote confusion and helps with assertion-reason and match-the-following questions.

9. Andhra Pradesh examples and candidate method

An AP candidate can map institutions by level and function:

  • APPSC: State Public Service Commission under Articles 315–323; consult the specific recruitment notification for who conducts an AP Police recruitment.
  • AP State Election Commission: local Panchayat and Municipal elections under Articles 243K and 243ZA.
  • CAG reports on AP: audited State accounts and reports follow Article 151’s Governor-to-Legislature route.
  • Advocate General for AP: Article 165 State law officer; not the Attorney General for India.
  • State Information Commission / State Human Rights Commission: statutory institutions under the relevant Parliamentary enactments and applicable State arrangements.

Do not insert present office-holder names into durable text unless the book has a dated current-affairs page and an explicit “as of” label. Names change; the legal source and function are more stable.

10. Revision checklist

  1. Ask whether the body is in the Constitution, a statute or an executive instrument.
  2. Identify the Article or Act before learning the function.
  3. Separate a recommendation from a binding decision, audit report from prosecution, and election supervision from election adjudication.
  4. Match Union-level bodies with State-level counterparts carefully.
  5. Verify current composition and office-holder facts on the official portal at the edition date.

Visual classification aid

Use the diagram to classify each institution by its legal source first; then learn its specific job and reporting route. The examples are representative, not exhaustive.

Worked application and retrieval drill

Worked case: a public complaint against an official

A person wants an audit, an investigation, an information copy and an election complaint. These are not one function. Start with the requested outcome. The CAG audits specified public accounts and reports through constitutional channels. An Information Commission acts under the RTI Act framework. The Central Vigilance Commission has a statutory basis and defined jurisdiction. The Election Commission of India has constitutional authority under Article 324 for the elections within its remit; local-body elections involve the State Election Commission under Articles 243K and 243ZA. A complaint to one body cannot be assumed to produce another body’s remedy.

Then classify each body by creation source: constitutional, statutory or executive. The source predicts the legal framework, but it does not fully describe powers. Read the enabling Article or Act for membership, appointment, function, reporting and limits. Public-service commissions, human-rights commissions and Lokpal/Lokayukta arrangements are not interchangeable merely because they handle public-administration concerns.

Retrieval drill

For every body in the chapter, write a four-part card: source; principal task; reporting or accountability route; what it does not do. The last line strengthens distractor rejection. If an item asks a current office-holder or changing membership count, verify a dated official source rather than using an undated memory aid.

Examiner distinction and source drill

Public accountability has specialised channels. An audit question is not an information request; an RTI appeal is not an election petition; a vigilance complaint is not automatically a criminal case. Identify the outcome sought, the body’s legal source, its jurisdiction and the route for review. Constitutional bodies have their mandate in the Constitution; statutory bodies receive authority under an Act; executive bodies depend on the instrument creating them. This classification aids recall, but exact powers still require the governing text. When a question names an “independent commission,” ask what independence means in its appointment, tenure, finance and reporting provisions rather than assuming every commission has identical safeguards. Current membership and office-holder claims need a dated official source.

Integrated problem-solving workshop

Scenario: choose the accountability destination

A citizen wants four things: an audit of public accounts, a copy of a file, a review of a human-rights complaint and a remedy for an election dispute. These requests point to distinct legal institutions and procedures. The CAG’s constitutional auditing role differs from an Information Commission’s statutory RTI appeal role. The National or State Human Rights Commission acts under the Protection of Human Rights Act framework. Election disputes are governed by constitutional provisions and election statutes, with forums depending on election type. A vigilance body’s jurisdiction is not a substitute for criminal investigation or a court’s judgment.

For each institution, identify source, appointment/tenure safeguards, task, report/decision route and limits. “Independent” is not a complete answer unless the constitutional or statutory safeguards are named. The CAG reports through prescribed constitutional channels; it does not prosecute every official. A commission recommendation may have a defined effect but should not be described as a binding judicial decree unless the law says so. Current names and membership counts change; use official dated pages if the question requires them.

Retrieval drill

Sort body names into constitutional, statutory or executive categories. Then hide the names and retrieve the body from the task. Finally, state one thing each body does not decide. Negative boundaries are useful: they prevent a candidate from selecting a body simply because its title sounds related.

Practice MCQs — original, explained

1. The Election Commission of India derives its principal constitutional authority from:

  • A. Article 324
  • B. Article 148
  • C. Article 243K
  • D. Article 280

Answer: A. Article 324 vests specified election-supervision functions in the ECI. Article 243K concerns Panchayat elections through the State Election Commission; Article 148 concerns the CAG; Article 280 concerns the Finance Commission.

2. Which election is ordinarily conducted by the State Election Commission under the local-government provisions?

  • A. President
  • B. Gram Panchayat
  • C. Vice-President
  • D. Lok Sabha

Answer: B. Panchayat elections are under Article 243K and municipal elections under Article 243ZA. The ECI handles Parliament, State Legislatures, President and Vice-President elections under Article 324.

3. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is provided for by:

  • A. Article 338
  • B. Article 165
  • C. Article 148
  • D. Article 315

Answer: C. Article 148 establishes the office. Articles 149–151 address duties, accounts and reporting; Article 165 concerns the Advocate General.

4. A CAG report relating to State accounts is submitted to the:

  • A. Chief Minister for laying before Parliament.
  • B. Chief Justice for laying before the Cabinet.
  • C. ECI for publication.
  • D. Governor for laying before the State Legislature.

Answer: D. Article 151 provides the route: State-account reports are submitted to the Governor for laying before the State Legislature.

5. The CAG’s work is best described as:

  • A. auditing and reporting under the constitutional and statutory framework.
  • B. voting on the State budget.
  • C. conducting all elections.
  • D. deciding criminal guilt.

Answer: A. The CAG audits and reports. Legislatures scrutinise reports; courts determine legal disputes and criminal guilt under applicable law.

6. Article 315 concerns:

  • A. the State Election Commission.
  • B. Public Service Commissions for the Union and States.
  • C. the GST Council.
  • D. the Attorney General.

Answer: B. Article 315 provides for UPSC and State Public Service Commissions and allows a route for a Joint State Public Service Commission.

7. Who appoints the Advocate General for a State under Article 165?

  • A. President
  • B. Chief Election Commissioner
  • C. Governor
  • D. Chief Justice of India

Answer: C. The Governor appoints an Advocate General who is qualified to be appointed a High Court judge.

8. Which of the following is statutory rather than created by a specific Constitution Article?

  • A. Election Commission of India
  • B. Finance Commission
  • C. Comptroller and Auditor General
  • D. Central Vigilance Commission

Answer: D. The CVC is established under the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003. The other listed institutions have direct constitutional bases.

9. The Central and State Information Commissions are established under the framework of:

  • A. Right to Information Act, 2005.
  • B. Seventh Schedule only.
  • C. Article 280 alone.
  • D. Article 148 alone.

Answer: A. The RTI Act, 2005 provides for Central and State Information Commissions as part of the statutory transparency framework.

10. The National Human Rights Commission is best classified as:

  • A. a constitutional court.
  • B. a statutory body under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.
  • C. a Union List entry.
  • D. a committee of Parliament established by Article 324.

Answer: B. The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 provides for the NHRC and State Human Rights Commissions.

11. Which statement about the Attorney General for India is correct?

  • A. The Attorney General is a member of the Supreme Court.
  • B. The Attorney General conducts elections.
  • C. Article 76 provides for the office; the Attorney General may participate in Parliament but does not vote solely by virtue of the office.
  • D. Article 165 provides for the Union Attorney General.

Answer: C. Article 76 creates the office; Article 88 gives participation rights in Parliament and committees without a vote merely because of that office.

12. A recruitment notification asks which authority conducts a particular AP Police selection. What is the safest exam and fact-checking method?

  • A. Ask the CAG to decide.
  • B. Assume UPSC conducts all government recruitment.
  • C. Assume APPSC conducts every recruitment.
  • D. Check the governing recruitment rules and the current official notification.

Answer: D. Different recruitments may be assigned to different authorities under applicable rules and notifications. The constitutional existence of APPSC does not make it the universal recruiting authority.

Chapter 15 answer key at a glance

1-C · 2-C · 3-A · 4-B · 5-A · 6-A · 7-B · 8-C · 9-A · 10-B · 11-A · 12-C

Sources and edition note

Primary text: Constitution of India, Legislative Department consolidated edition dated 1 May 2026, especially Articles 76, 88, 148–151, 165, 243K, 243ZA, 280, 315–323 and 324. Official cross-checks: ECI, “About ECI”; Comptroller and Auditor General, constitutional arrangement / Article 148; UPSC, Article 315; India Code entries for the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003, Right to Information Act, 2005, Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, and Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013. The legal classification and explanations are original. Recheck office-holder names, current appointments, amendments and recruitment notifications at publication.

Page 1 of 1
‹
›