Study Guide · Chapter 5
4. Catalogue of Examiner Favourite Traps
Free study material · concepts, shortcuts & solved questions
The patterns below repeat across SSC, RRB, and Bank papers with striking consistency — several have appeared, in near-identical form, in multiple different exam cycles. Each entry gives a short description of the trap and one illustrative example (not always in full segmented format, to keep this catalogue scannable — full segmented versions of most of these patterns appear across Sections 3, 5, and 7).
- "Less" with a countable noun. "Less marks were awarded" should be "fewer marks." Example: "There were less candidates in the hall this year than expected." — should be "fewer candidates."
- "Since" with simple past instead of a perfect tense. "He is working here since 2019" should be "has been working here since 2019." Example: "She taught grammar since 2018 at the same institute." — should be "has been teaching."
- "Discuss about." "Discuss" is already transitive and needs no "about": "discuss the issue," not "discuss about the issue." Example: "The panel wants to discuss about the candidate's project report." — should be "discuss the candidate's project report."
- "One of the + plural noun" taking a singular verb, which paper-setters present as an "error" when the verb is wrongly made plural. Example: "One of the reasons for the low turnout are the sudden rainfall." — should be "is."
- "Each/every" triggering a plural verb. Example: "Each of the rooms were checked before the exam began." — should be "was checked."
- "Return back" and "revert back." Both are redundant; drop "back." Example: "Kindly return back the library books before the semester ends." — should be "return the library books."
- "Comprised of." "Comprise" already means "to consist of" or "to be made up of"; the correct forms are "comprises" (no "of") or "is composed of," never "comprised of" in the strictest formal register. Example: "The panel is comprised of five senior officers." — should be "comprises five senior officers" or "is composed of five senior officers."
- "Married with" instead of "married to." Example: "She got married with a fellow candidate she met at the coaching centre." — should be "married to."
- Dangling "having" participial openers with no logical subject in the main clause, as covered in Section 3.10. Example: "Having submitted the form late, the application was rejected by the portal." — should be restructured so the candidate, not the application, is the subject: "...he found his application rejected."
- "Data" and "criteria" treated as singular. Both are technically plural (singular: "datum," "criterion"), so "the data is" and "the criteria is" are flagged in strict formal usage, though this rule is applied more loosely by some modern answer keys — treat it as high-risk but check the specific exam's convention where possible. Example: "The criteria for shortlisting is yet to be finalised." — the stricter formal fix is "are yet to be finalised."
- "Fewer" wrongly applied to uncountable nouns, the mirror-image trap of pattern 1. Example: "The revised syllabus has fewer content compared to the earlier one." — should be "less content."
- Double comparatives/superlatives. "More better," "most best," "more easier" all stack two degree markers where only one is needed. Example: "This paper felt more easier than the previous attempt." — should be simply "easier."
- "Farther" (physical distance) confused with "further" (abstract extent). Example: "We need to discuss this farther before finalising the roster." — should be "further," since the discussion is abstract, not physical distance.
- "Between" used for more than two, "among" for two — reversed from the correct rule. Example: "The prize money was divided between the three finalists." — should be "among the three finalists."
- Missing "the" before a superlative. Example: "She scored highest marks in the entire district." — should be "the highest marks."
- "Inspite of" written as one word, or confused with "despite," which never takes "of" after it. Example: "Despite of repeated reminders, he missed the registration deadline." — should be "Despite repeated reminders" or "In spite of repeated reminders."
- "Suggest to + infinitive" instead of the correct "suggest + gerund/that-clause." Example: "The mentor suggested him to apply for the scholarship early." — should be "suggested that he apply" or "suggested applying."
- Misuse of "myself/himself/herself" as a plain subject or object pronoun. Example: "Myself and my colleague attended the orientation session together." — should be "My colleague and I attended."
- "Inform" without an indirect object where one is grammatically expected in formal register. Example: "The board informed about the postponement through a press release." — should be "informed candidates about the postponement."
- Redundant "as well as" doubling with "and," or wrongly replacing "both...and." Example: "Both the syllabus as well as the exam pattern were revised this year." — should be "both the syllabus and the exam pattern."
- "Its" vs. "it's." The possessive "its" has no apostrophe; "it's" is only the contraction of "it is." Example: "The institute revised it's admission policy this year." — should be "its admission policy."
- "Who" vs. "whom" in object position. Example: "Who did the panel shortlist for the final round?" — strict formal usage expects "Whom did the panel shortlist," since "whom" is the object of "shortlist."
- "Advise" (verb) vs. "advice" (noun) confusion. Example: "The mentor gave him useful advise before the interview." — should be "advice," the noun form.
- "Ago" paired incorrectly with "since." Example: "It is two years ago since he joined the coaching institute." — should be either "It is two years since he joined" or "He joined two years ago," never both together.
- Wrong preposition after "wait," or confusion with "await," which never takes "for." Example: "Please await for further instructions from the exam controller." — should be simply "await further instructions" (no "for").
- Reduplicated negatives with "hardly," "scarcely," "barely." Example: "He hasn't hardly revised the current affairs section this month." — should be "has hardly revised," dropping the double negative.
- "Alike" wrongly modified by "both...to each other." Example: "The twins both look alike to each other even in their handwriting." — should drop "to each other," since "alike" already implies mutual resemblance.
- Verb-first inversion errors after fronted negative adverbs ("Never," "Rarely," "Seldom," "No sooner," "Hardly"). Example: "Never he attended a single revision class organised by the centre." — should be "Never did he attend."
- "Later" (time) confused with "latter" (the second of two items). Example: "He submitted his form later than the latter candidate on the waiting list," used where no earlier pair of candidates has actually been established — should simply read "the other candidate."
- "Stationary" (not moving) confused with "stationery" (writing materials). Example: "The invigilator kept an extra box of stationary in the drawer." — should be "stationery."
- Uncountable nouns wrongly pluralised: "informations," "furnitures," "homeworks," "equipments," "luggages" are never standard English plurals. Example: "The board shared several informations about the revised pattern." — should be "pieces of information" or simply "information."
- "Except" (excluding) confused with "accept" (to agree to receive). Example: "The committee refused to except his late application." — should be "accept his late application."
- Redundant "the reason is because." "Because" already means "for the reason that"; correct is "the reason is that" or simply "because." Example: "The reason for the delay is because the server crashed." — should be "The reason for the delay is that the server crashed."
- Misplaced "only," "even," "also" shifting the sentence's intended emphasis. Example: "Only she scored a hundred in the mock test" (nobody else did) versus "She only scored a hundred" (she did nothing beyond scoring a hundred) — the position of "only" changes meaning, and exam-setters exploit exactly this shift.
- "Prone to" wrongly followed by a bare infinitive. "Prone" is fixed to a gerund, not an infinitive. Example: "Weak students are often prone to make careless mistakes under time pressure." — should be "prone to making careless mistakes."
- "Compare to" vs. "compare with" confused. "Compare to" highlights similarity between essentially unlike things (a metaphorical comparison); "compare with" examines two like things for similarities and differences — most exam sentences call for "compare with." Example: "This year's paper cannot be compared to last year's in terms of difficulty level." — the more precise formal choice is "compared with."
- "Try and" used instead of "try to." Informal spoken usage; formal written English expects the infinitive. Example: "Candidates should try and finish the reasoning section within twenty minutes." — should be "try to finish."
- Redundant "repeat again" / "repeat the same." "Repeat" already implies doing something again. Example: "Please do not repeat the same mistake in the next attempt." — should be simply "repeat the mistake" or "make the same mistake again," not both stacked.
- "Convince" wrongly followed by a bare infinitive instead of "that" or "to" with a different sense. Example: "He tried to convince the officer to reconsidering the rejected form." — mixing "to" with a gerund is wrong; it should be "convince the officer to reconsider," a plain infinitive.
- Wrong tense after "if only" / "wish" expressing an unreal present regret. Example: "I wish I have more time to revise before the exam." — should be "I wish I had more time," using the past subjunctive form even though the wish is about the present.
- "Beside" (next to) confused with "besides" (in addition to). Example: "Beside revising grammar, she also practised comprehension passages daily." — should be "Besides revising grammar."
- Redundant "return" with a direction already implied by "back." Similar to trap 6 but tested with "return" alone plus a redundant direction word: "He wanted to return back home." — should be simply "return home."
- "Consist of" wrongly followed by "in." Example: "The test consists in four sections." — should be "consists of four sections."
- "Equally as" used instead of plain "equally" or "as...as." Example: "The two candidates performed equally as well." — should be simply "equally well."
- Verb "lay" (to place something) confused with "lie" (to recline). Example: "He decided to lay down for a few minutes before the exam." — should be "lie down," since no object is being placed.
- "Alternate" (every other one) confused with "alternative" (a different option). Example: "The board provided an alternate date for candidates affected by the strike." — should be "alternative date."
- Redundant "still yet" or "yet still." Example: "She had still yet to receive her admit card three days before the exam." — should be simply "still" or "yet," not both.
- "Enormity" (the extreme seriousness of something bad) misused to mean simply "enormous size." Example: "He was struck by the enormity of the new campus." — should be "enormous size" or "vastness," reserving "enormity" for something gravely wrong.
- "Practically" misused to mean "in a practical manner" when "virtually/almost" is intended. Example: "The syllabus was practically identical to last year's." — this use, meaning "almost," is broadly accepted in modern usage but flagged in the strictest formal keys, which prefer "virtually identical."
- Redundant "true fact." Example: "It is a true fact that the cutoff dropped this year." — should be simply "a fact."
Page 1 of 1